inference engine — online

Satyam
Chatrola

AI Systems Engineer · LLM inference & serving

scroll to boot

response

> whoami

focus

What I do

inference

Inference optimization

Cutting latency and cost out of model serving — batching, KV-cache reuse, quantization, and semantic caching to shave every millisecond off time-to-first-token.

serving

Serving infrastructure

Packaging models as reliable, reproducible low-latency endpoints with vLLM, Truss, and Docker — shipped through CI/CD and built to stay up under load.

internals

Systems from first principles

Understanding the stack end to end: autograd, transformer internals, and language models built from scratch — so optimization is grounded, not guessed.

scale

Scale & reliability

Designing planet-scale AI systems with software-engineering rigor and MLOps discipline — efficient, observable, and robust in production.

signal

I turn models into
fast, dependable endpoints.

inference speedup
0F1 · 750+ profiles
0M+SKUs searched
+0%click-through lift

I'm an AI Systems Engineer and MS Computer Science student at NYU, focused on the part of machine learning that decides whether it's actually useful: how it's served. My work sits where software engineering, systems, and ML meet — making inference fast, cheap, and reliable at scale.

  • Delivered up to 7× inference speedups through quantization, and shipped low-latency inference microservices into production.
  • Architected a real-time facial recognition & authentication system reaching 0.96 F1 across 750+ profiles on live video — new identities enroll with no retraining.
  • Built hyper-personalized search over 5M+ SKUs and recommenders that lifted conversion 7.2% and click-through 34%.
AWS-Certified ML Engineer1st Runner-Up · Qualcomm × Microsoft Edge AI HackathonMS Computer Science · NYU

work

Selected projects

All repositories on GitHub

research

Published · peer-reviewed

Benchmarking Fine-Tuned Transformers, LLMs and LSTM Networks for Automated Essay Scoring

A comparative study of how transformer fine-tuning, large language models, and recurrent baselines trade off accuracy against the cost of scoring at scale — with the fine-tuned approach exceeding prior benchmarks by 5.7%.