Inference optimization
Cutting latency and cost out of model serving — batching, KV-cache reuse, quantization, and semantic caching to shave every millisecond off time-to-first-token.
inference engine — online
AI Systems Engineer · LLM inference & serving
response
> whoami
focus
Cutting latency and cost out of model serving — batching, KV-cache reuse, quantization, and semantic caching to shave every millisecond off time-to-first-token.
Packaging models as reliable, reproducible low-latency endpoints with vLLM, Truss, and Docker — shipped through CI/CD and built to stay up under load.
Understanding the stack end to end: autograd, transformer internals, and language models built from scratch — so optimization is grounded, not guessed.
Designing planet-scale AI systems with software-engineering rigor and MLOps discipline — efficient, observable, and robust in production.
signal
I'm an AI Systems Engineer and MS Computer Science student at NYU, focused on the part of machine learning that decides whether it's actually useful: how it's served. My work sits where software engineering, systems, and ML meet — making inference fast, cheap, and reliable at scale.
work
Contextual-RAG research assistant on AWS. Compresses embeddings with binary quantization and keeps the vector store in memory to minimize retrieval latency at scale.
Reproducible LLM serving with vLLM, packaged in Docker images for consistent, portable high-throughput inference.
Semantic cache, vector store, and RAG built on FAISS — cutting repeat-query latency and cost by serving from cache when meaning matches.
Model packaging and deployment with Truss — turning a trained model into a served endpoint with minimal glue.
A language model built from scratch in PyTorch, iteratively evolved from foundations toward current industry-standard architecture.
Reimplementing Karpathy's micrograd — a tiny autograd engine — to understand backprop from first principles.
research
A comparative study of how transformer fine-tuning, large language models, and recurrent baselines trade off accuracy against the cost of scoring at scale — with the fine-tuned approach exceeding prior benchmarks by 5.7%.